On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 7:16 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov <bu7c...@yandex.ru> wrote:
> On 23.01.2018 03:35, Alan Somers wrote: > > All of these problems could be solved if pf were able to redirect a > > packet's destination port but not its address. You could bind the daemon > > to INADDR_ANY instead of localhost, and the packet it receives would be > > destined to the same address that the sender intended. > > > > Unfortunately, pf currently lacks this capability. But it looks like it > > could be added without breaking existing pf.conf syntax. Would this be a > > good idea? > > > > I don't use ipfw, but from reading the man page I believe that it has the > > same problem. > > I think ipfw should work with such configuration using "fwd" action, > since TCP/UDP has special handling for this. The man page says that the fwd directive always takes an IP address. What I need is a way to forward the port without changing the IP address. Is that possible in ipfw? _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
