kczekirda added a comment.
And the last one possible solution: In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D10485#218945, @tsoome wrote: > But also there is much simpler way to distinguish NFS versus TFTP boot - because that is the problem - how to understand if we should go for NFS of for TFTP. And the idea is simple - if there is no server set, we opt to use next server option for nfs/tftp server; now the root_path syntax as such is not set, therefore we can just state that if the root_path is IP:/path then its NFS, if the root_path is /path, then it is TFTP. Don't use any of 66 or 150 option, but when root-path includes ip address - go thru NFS, if ip address not exists in root-path - go thru TFTP from server which ip address is in next-server. But there is one limitation - only one tftp server in network to provide loader and everything else. Does enybody use more than only one? REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D10485 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: kczekirda, bapt, oshogbo, tsoome, sbruno, #network, freebsd-net-list, imp, jhb Cc: rgrimes, garga, ler, asomers _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
