On Fri, 7 Apr 2017, ?ukasz W?jcik wrote: ?W>they're not the only ones. Just my 5cents. The other thing is that ATM/NATM ?W>infrastructure in FreeBSD seems to never have been ?W> ?W>finished.
That's true. ITU-T used to produce poor-quality ATM standards at a much higher rate than anybody could follow and the ATM-Forum at one point decided just to copy the ITU-T stuff :-(. Then I changed work and had almost zero involvment with ATM anymore... I would guess that keeping ATM alive in 11-stable (and updating drivers if necessary) would be the best way to go. harti ?W> ?W> ?W>On 07-Apr-17 01:57, Brooks Davis wrote: ?W>> As previously threatened, I plan to remove NATM support next week. This ?W>> includes the drivers en(4), fatm(4), hatm(4), and patm(4). None of ?W>> these devices have been manufactured in the last 20 years so it is time ?W>> to move on. ?W>> ?W>> The planned commit can be seen at https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9883 ?W>> ?W>> -- Brooks ?W> ?W> ?W>_______________________________________________ ?W>freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list ?W>https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net ?W>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
