On Tue Dec 20 01:51:17 2016, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 20.12.2016 1:46, Alarig Le Lay пишет:
> 
> > Is it possible to avoid this behaviour and reply with the public IP
> > (89.234.186.1) instead?
> 
> try: sysctl net.inet.icmp.reply_from_interface=1

If an AS choose to go to us thought this peer, packets will come in by
this interface, so our router will continue to reply with the apipa IP
for those ASes.

-- 
alarig

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to