On Tue Dec 20 01:51:17 2016, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 20.12.2016 1:46, Alarig Le Lay пишет: > > > Is it possible to avoid this behaviour and reply with the public IP > > (89.234.186.1) instead? > > try: sysctl net.inet.icmp.reply_from_interface=1
If an AS choose to go to us thought this peer, packets will come in by this interface, so our router will continue to reply with the apipa IP for those ASes. -- alarig
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature