On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 8:07 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov <s...@zxy.spb.ru> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 04:02:20PM +0200, Kajetan Staszkiewicz wrote: > >> On day piątek, 2 września 2016 13:02:03 Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: >> >> > > > PS: 100G transmiters and connectiveti too expensive, 2x40G prefer. >> > > >> > > You can put 2x 40GBit/s modules in the CX-4. I'm not sure if you can >> > > combine 2x 40GBit/s into a single 80GBit/s. >> > >> > I can do it by if_lagg. >> >> Plase note that by using link aggregation you can not achieve full speed over >> a single TCP stream. Onle when multiple streams are in operation you will >> really get the aggregated speed. > > NP, I am have more then 40K TCP stream. > > PS: link aggregation with round-roubin policy can achieve full speed.
At those speeds I would recommend link aggregation with LACP. It has less lock contention than round-robin and should give you fine distribution with 40K streams. -Alan _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
