https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166255
--- Comment #24 from Chris Hutchinson <portmas...@bsdforge.com> --- (In reply to eugen from comment #21) > (In reply to Chris Hutchinson from comment #20) > > You are essentially proposing the system to spend CPU time generating tons > of messages, pass them from the kernel to userland daemon using socket > subsystem and then spend more CPU time to filter them. Instead of just not > doing that all in expense of single extra tunnable. I'd just like to go on record as indicating that this is a security related issue, and one would *want* to know about it. In the rare case that this is *not* true. syslog(3) should be asked to deal with it. Has secteam@ weighed in on this? But given this bug has been closed, those of us whom are opposed to this change, will simply need to add a local patch to reverse it. Thank you for your indulgence. --Chris -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
