sepherosa_gmail.com added a comment.

  In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872#128542, @mike-karels.net wrote:
  
  >   btw, I think the line to set the snd_cwnd should remain for now, until 
something replaces it.  ENOBUFS signals local congestion.
  
  
  Well, resetting the cwnd can be unfair for the connections encounters the 
ENOBUFS, since the underlying hardware can be flooded by other connections.  So 
I'd remove that cwnd resetting upon ENOBUFS.  We can open another discussion 
after fixing this issue first.

REVISION DETAIL
  https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: sepherosa_gmail.com, network, glebius, adrian, delphij, 
decui_microsoft.com, honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0su_gmail.com, 
freebsd-net-list, lstewart, hiren, jtl, transport
Cc: gnn, mike-karels.net, jtl
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to