On 1/24/2016 at 5:56 AM, "Marcus Cenzatti" <cenza...@hush.com> wrote: > >On 1/24/2016 at 5:17 AM, "Luigi Rizzo" <ri...@iet.unipi.it> wrote: >> >>On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Marcus Cenzatti >><cenza...@hush.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 1/24/2016 at 3:33 AM, "Luigi Rizzo" <ri...@iet.unipi.it> >>wrote: >>... >> >>> ok here it is >>> >>> this lowered pps rate to 9.4Mpps on chelsio (we had 11Mpps with >>defaul len) and lowered rates to 14Mpps on sender (we had >14.8Mpps >>before). >> >>see the other email from navdeep, he suggests to try -l 62 >>because the chelsio saves the packet with a 2-byte offset >>into the buffer (it puzzles me a bit that it does so also >>in netmap mode though). >> >>cheers >>luigi > >yes, I saw, i've run both with 62 bytes and 64 bytes len
i mean 62 and 66 > >very different results from the previous one and among both pkt >sizes but could not go beyond 11Mpps > >results: > >-l 62 = TX 14.8Mpps RX 11Mpps >-l 66 = TX 12.4Mpps RX 9.4Mpps > _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
