On 1/23/2016 at 1:31 PM, "Adrian Chadd" <adrian.ch...@gmail.com> wrote: > >For random src/dst ports and IPs and on the chelsio t5 40gig >hardware, >I was getting what, uhm, 40mil tx pps and around 25ish mil rx pps? > >The chelsio rx path really wants to be coalescing rx buffers, which >the netmap API currently doesn't support. I've no idea if luigi has >plans to add that. So, it has the hilarious side effect of "adding >more RX queues" translates to "drops in RX performance." :( > >Thanks,
hello, I am sorry, are you saying intel and chelsio distribute RX packet load differently? If I am not mistaken intel will distributed traffic among queues based on ip addresses flow/hashes/whatever, does chelsio make it per packet or somethig other? how does this behavior you noticed could affect single queue (or applications on netmap:if0 and not netmap:if0-n) on chelsio? thanks _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
