Thank you for pointing out that.
I will try to rewrite some (if I could), like the the ASCII path that received.
(It may reduce some time or not? But just try....)
On Mon, 4 Jan 2016, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 4/01/2016 5:32 AM, HuanHuan wrote:
Hi Rui,
There are no existing applications, but these two calls are for developing
new application on 10G links.
Currently I use netgraph, especially ng_socket node. And a simple
recvfrom() on a ng_socket costs ~5us or so (200K per second). And there are
many netgraph sockets. So it's good to reduce the time by ultilizing
send/recvmmsg() if there are these two syscalls. Even a simple-loop like
implmentation like linux's will be good as Luigi has suggested.
As the writer of netgraph I would like to point out that it was never
designed to be a high throughput service.
I'm happy thought that it CAN be used at these speeds but I designed it for
prototyping and for serial line speeds.
The idea was that once something was prototyped out, one would take the code
from all the modules used and create
a special purpose module that dd what you need.
The fact that people have not needed the last step is gratifying but
surprising.
On Sun, 3 Jan 2016, Rui Paulo wrote:
On Sun, 2016-01-03 at 18:34 +0800, HuanHuan wrote:
NetBSD 7.0 has just introduced these two syscalls.
And Linux also has them.
Does FreeBSD have them? Or plan to support them in the future?
FreeBSD does not have them. It doesn't seem especially hard to
implement, though. Do you know any major application already using
them?
--
Rui Paulo
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
