https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=156226
--- Comment #18 from eu...@grosbein.net --- (In reply to weberge42 from comment #17) > If failover using lagg with different switches is not supported or is > considered exotic, the feature should be removed. The docs do not mention > that this is the case. lagg failover works just fine at present using links connected to the switch(es) with single FIB (just one switch or stack of switches) and should not be removed. I agree that documentation may need some warnings against not supported configurations but it cannot foretell all kinds of network setups built on wrong assumptions. OTOH, it can give a hint towards other known ways to build failure-resistant setups like RSTP etc. Some short hint, because man page is not textbook. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
