On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 09:28:07AM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > > > On 31 Aug 2015, at 04:05 , Tiwei Bie <b...@mail.ustc.edu.cn> wrote: > > > > I found a bug in udp6_input(). The 'proto' parameter should be used to > > get the protocol number (UDP or UDPLITE), instead of ip6->ip6_nxt. > > > > Because ip6->ip6_nxt may be the protocol number of extension header, > > such as: > > > > If a UDP packet is an "atomic" fragment, frag6_input() will return > > directly, and ip6->ip6_nxt will be IPPROTO_FRAGMENT (if the first > > extension header is the fragment header) instead of IPPROTO_UDP or > > IPPROTO_UDPLITE: > > Hmm, that might be a bug elsewhere but atomic fragments are soon to go away > again; wish people would listen in first place; but anyway. > > There are more of these bugs that came with the UDP-Lite code, such as > 4mapped addresses are not handled correctly in the output path, etc. > > Can you open a bug for this and we can attach all the UDP-Lite fixes to it to > properly document them and get them through review in a few days and > committed? >
Sure! ^_^ Here is the link: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202788 Best regards, Tiwei Bie _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
