On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 20:42:08 -0400 (EDT) Rick Macklem
<rmack...@uoguelph.ca> wrote about Re: NFS on 10G interface terribly slow:
RM> Btw, can you tell us what Intel chip(s) you're using?
I have
ix0@pci0:5:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x00028086 chip=0x15288086 rev=0x01
hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation'
device = 'Ethernet Controller 10-Gigabit X540-AT2'
class = network
subclass = ethernet
RM> For example, from the "ix" driver:
RM> #define IXGBE_82598_SCATTER 100
RM> #define IXGBE_82599_SCATTER 32
Hm, I cannot find out into which chipset number this translates for my
device...
RM> Btw, it appears that the driver in head/current now sets
RM> if_hw_tsomaxsegcount, but the driver in stable/10 does not. This means
RM> that the 82599 chip will end up doing the m_defrag() calls for 10.x.
So the next step could even be updating to -current...
OTOH, I get the same (bad) resulsts, no matter if TSO is enabled or
disabled on the interface.
cu
Gerrit
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
