nvass-gmx.com added a comment. >>! In D1944#11, @kristof wrote: > Don't we still need to do all of this somewhere?
>>! In D1944#11, @kristof wrote: > Don't we still need to do all of this somewhere? INLINE COMMENTS sys/netpfil/pf/pf_ioctl.c:325 pf_unload is called before pf_vnet_unit, this is why we do very little things in pf_unload. We need everything until the last vnet is destroyed. sys/netpfil/pf/pf_ioctl.c:3725 The patch includes per-VNET initialization, so this is not need anymore. pf_vnet_init() handles all per-VNET initialization, including DEFAULT_VNET. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1944 To: nvass-gmx.com, gnn, bz, zec, trociny, glebius, rodrigc, kristof Cc: freebsd-virtualization, freebsd-pf, freebsd-net _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
