On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 08:25:59PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: A> [snip] A> A> I think Mike's approach is good - it makes it easy to MFC to 10.2 A> since there's extended lifecycle stuff to do there - and then we can A> plan out how do the "betterer" fix after it's landed and churned A> things.
... and we will be ought to support the "betterer" fix along with the "not so betterer" for a very long time. The rock on which we split in this argument is that some developers write their code for stable/x and then forward-port it to head, focused on quality of result for stable/x; while other developers do the opposite: write code to head, then consider or not consider merging it stable/x. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
