On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Mark Felder <f...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014, at 17:59, Outback Dingo wrote: > > > > > Im quite curious why you would want to include something thats been found > > to be broken and not functional > > into mainline.... if it was working sure... im sure we would love it. > > However its been months rolling along to get > > this patch set out after reporting previous bugs that... well... still > > remain. Id suggest to clear up and push > > a functional working implementation, might gather more participants. > > > > > > This kind of response isn't exactly productive. We need to encourage > those who are working on new features and find a way to easily provide > them with a wide audience of testers. > Isnt that exactly what i just stated...?? I just didnt see why.. we would want it in mainline... as part of a branch until merged working would be my thoughts... but yes there are issues, and a much wider audience would help smooth out the feature.... and get more eyes on it. Just as I suggested in my previous email. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
