https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185967
--- Comment #11 from oliv...@cochard.me --- (In reply to kvedulv from comment #10) > Hi Oliver, > > (In reply to olivier from comment #8) > > The patch didn't solve Lagg regression between 9.2 and 10-stable (r267244). > > > > My configuration only use one lagg member (the second will be added later): > > _Maybe_ #179926 is your Bug and you could try the patch over there... > (Although that problem seems to have existed at least in 9.1) I believe it's not a regression in my case: On FreeBSD 9.2, the lagg-lacp mode by not implementing a 'strict' mode was equivalent to a 'static+optionnal LACP' mode. The behavior of lagg-lacp on 9.2 seems: - If no LACP detected, allow a minimum of 1 lagg member to transmit. The behavior on 10 seems: - If no LACP detected, don't allow any of the lagg member to transmit (even with strict_mode disabled) And in my case: I didn't have a LACP device in front of my FreeBSD. Then I simply need to use a 'static' mode (like loadbalanced or roundrobin). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
