Russell L. Carter wrote: > > > On 07/29/14 13:48, Rick Macklem wrote: > > Russell L. Carter: > > > > > The "directories within a file system" exports are only enforced by > > the Mount protocol that NFSv3 uses to talk to mountd. (NFSv4 does > > not > > use the Mount protocol.) These are considered "administrative > > controls", > > which is a nice way of saying "they aren't actually enforced by the > > kernel > > because there is no easy way to do so, but will discourage trivial > > attempts > > to do NFSv3 mounts". > > > > Personally, I've never liked these "administrative controls", but > > others > > feel they are useful (introduced long long ago by SunOS) and > > getting rid > > of them would be considered a POLA violation. (This was one of the > > reasons > > why nfse was never adopted as a replacement for mountd.) > > > > Various people have tried to clarify this in "man exports". Any > > patches > > that improve this will be appreciated. (It just seems to be a > > difficult > > thing to explain.) > > I performed two more experiments with more than one "V4:" line in > exports(5) (all zfs sharenfs=on filesystems): > > V4: /export/usr > V4: /export/library > > and > > V4: /export > V4: /export2 > > but mountd complains e.g.: "different V4 dirpath /export/usr" > (Note that the > Well, I think this one is fairly clearly stated in the description of the "V4:" line, where it says that it must be the same directory path for all entries.
> So to tighten up just slightly the situation as you have described > it: > > "There can only be one NFSv4 root filesystem per server, and any > client > host granted NFSv4 access to any subdirectory of that root exported > filesystem can also mount any other subdirectory of the root > exported > filesystem." > > Why not just say this in exports(5)? As I originally observed, > another way of saying this is that for -sec=sys, no per-host (or > per-network) access control for the subdirectories of the single > NFSv4 exported filesystem is possible. > Yeh, the one about "mounting any subdir" is hidden in the first page of "man exports", where it mentions this and how "-alldirs" is assumed for NFSv4. I think words similar to the above would make it clearer. I'll post a exports(5) patch soon for review. > I don't actually think very much is problematical about this > situation, because w/o krb5 the protocol is insecure (IMHO). I was > just very curious what the current state of play was, *exactly*. > > Anyway, thanks for your patience explaining this stuff to me. > > Ok, I think that I can stop gnawing on this bone now... > > Best, > Russell > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
