On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 7:54 PM, hiren panchasara <hiren.panchas...@gmail.com > wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Bryan Venteicher > <bry...@daemoninthecloset.org> wrote: > > Awhile back, DragonlyFlyBSD added a netbw option to systat that I've > ported > > to FreeBSD and found handy at various times: > > > > netbw Display aggregate and per-connection TCP receive and > transmit > > rates. Only active TCP connections are shown. > > > > Leading to output such as: > > > > tcp accepts connects rcv 1.192G snd 15.77K rexmit > > > > 192.168.10.80:22 192.168.10.20:23103 rcv snd 415.7 [ > NTSX ] > > 192.168.10.80:22 192.168.10.20:46560 rcv 19.80M snd 14.47K [ > NTSX ] > > 192.168.10.80:22 192.168.10.20:60699 rcv snd 886.3 [ > NTSX ] > > 192.168.10.81:5201 192.168.10.51:60844 rcv 293.2M snd [R > TSX ] > > 192.168.10.81:5201 192.168.10.51:60845 rcv 293.5M snd [R > TSX ] > > 192.168.10.81:5201 192.168.10.51:60846 rcv 293.2M snd [R > TSX ] > > 192.168.10.81:5201 192.168.10.51:60847 rcv 292.9M snd [R > TSX ] > > > > It uses the sequences number from the 'struct tcpcb' to derive the rates, > > which is usually good but certainly not perfect (i.e., don't set the > > interval too long). > > > > I'd like to commit this if anybody else thinks they'd find it useful. > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~bryanv/patches/systat-netbw.patch > > I like the idea. > > A few things about the patch: > 1) You may want to remove the code hidden behind "#if 0" at 2 places. > That's inherited as is from the DragonflyBSD code, and I was trying to keep the diff relativity small with upstream. I'll remove it the hidden code. > 2) I am not entirely clear on why/if we need the last column with > flags but if we keep it (for compatibility of any other reason), It > would be nice to have those flags explained in the manpage: > > + mvwprintw(wnd, LINES-2, 0, > + "Rate/sec, " > + "R=rxpend T=txpend N=nodelay T=tstmp " > + "S=sack X=winscale F=fastrec"); > Yes, I'll document them. > 3) I feel that the header line for o/p (specially 'tcp accepts and > connects' terminology) can be improved but I do not have a better > suggestion :-) > > It looks okay me otherwise and thanks for your work. > > cheers, > Hiren > _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
