On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 07:33:39PM +0400, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote: > On 22.05.2014 18:56, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote: > > It looks like we have reached some kind of consensus on table naming, > so I'm going to implement the following as the first part: > > * named-only tables, no "user-visible" indexes > * Keep the same opcodes, use additional TLVs to pass names in rules > * Use explicit userland object names retrieval while listing > * Make the previous ones easily extendable for other ipfw objects > * Introduce table references and explicit typecasting (while permitting > user to refernce non-existing tables) > > * leave table atomics for one the next stages > > > Are you OK with this?
yes i think so, this seems a good plan. thanks for following up cheers luigi _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
