On 11 April 2014 05:58, Dennis Yusupoff <d...@smartspb.net> wrote: > NAT realized with pf nat, shaping with ipfw dummynet and traffic > accounting with ng_netflow via ipfw ng_tee. >
Good time, Dennis. May I ask how much clients do you nat, shape and account? Why you do that with both engines (pf + ipfw)? Why not ipfw only with in-kernel NAT? Best regards, Raimundo _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
