Sweet!
I'll ask around and see if anyone netmap clued can review. :)
-a
On 10 April 2014 08:18, Karim Fodil-Lemelin <fodillemlinka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> By the way this change has opened the gates to greater performance for us
> when using ng_callout() inside nodes. In some cases we see twice as much pps
> since packets are direct dispatched instead of being queued in software
> interrupts threads (swi*).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Karim
>
> PS: I did file a PR : kern/188421
>
>
> On 09/04/2014 9:09 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Would you mind filing a PR for this?
>>
>> www.freebsd.org/send-pr.html
>>
>> That way it won't (hopefully!) get lost.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>> -a
>>
>>
>> On 9 April 2014 14:25, Karim Fodil-Lemelin <fodillemlinka...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Below is a revised patch for this issue. It accounts for nodes or hooks
>>> that
>>> explicitly need to be queuing:
>>>
>>> @@ -3632,7 +3632,12 @@ ng_callout(struct callout *c, node_p node, hook_p
>>> hook, int ticks,
>>>
>>> if ((item = ng_alloc_item(NGQF_FN, NG_NOFLAGS)) == NULL)
>>> return (ENOMEM);
>>>
>>> - item->el_flags |= NGQF_WRITER;
>>> + if ((node->nd_flags & NGF_FORCE_WRITER) ||
>>> + (hook && (hook->hk_flags & HK_FORCE_WRITER)))
>>>
>>> + item->el_flags |= NGQF_WRITER;
>>> + else
>>>
>>> + item->el_flags |= NGQF_READER;
>>> +
>>> NG_NODE_REF(node); /* and one for the item */
>>> NGI_SET_NODE(item, node);
>>> if (hook) {
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Karim.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09/04/2014 3:16 PM, Karim Fodil-Lemelin wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi List,
>>>>
>>>> I'm calling out to the general wisdom ... I have seen an issue in
>>>> netgraph
>>>> where, if called, a callout routine registered by ng_callout() will
>>>> trigger
>>>> packet queuing inside the worklist of netgraph since ng_callout() makes
>>>> my
>>>> node suddenly a WRITER node (therefore non reentrant) for the duration
>>>> of
>>>> the call.
>>>>
>>>> So as soon as the callout function returns, all following packets will
>>>> get
>>>> directly passed to the node again and when the ngintr thread gets
>>>> executed
>>>> then only then will I get the queued packets. This introduces out of
>>>> order
>>>> packets in the flow. I am using the current patch below to solve the
>>>> issue
>>>> and I am wondering if there is anything wrong with it (and maybe
>>>> contribute
>>>> back :):
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> @@ -3632,7 +3632,7 @@ ng_callout(struct callout *c, node_p node, hook_p
>>>> hook, int ticks,
>>>> if ((item = ng_alloc_item(NGQF_FN, NG_NOFLAGS)) == NULL)
>>>> return (ENOMEM);
>>>>
>>>> - item->el_flags |= NGQF_WRITER;
>>>> + item->el_flags = NGQF_READER;
>>>> NG_NODE_REF(node); /* and one for the item */
>>>> NGI_SET_NODE(item, node);
>>>> if (hook) {
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Karim.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
>>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
