On 06 Apr 2014, at 17:04 , Michael Tuexen <michael.tue...@lurchi.franken.de> 
wrote:

>> Aehm, the SCTP code was filtering addresses at one point and made sure only 
>> jail-visible addresses were seen or bound very much like normal PCB 
>> handling.  If this is not the case (anymore) SCTP shall not be allowed 
>> inside jails again. 
> Are you referring to prison_local_ip4() and prison_local_ip6() calls?
> These are used while explicit binding. However, I don't think we
> do the corresponding filtering when sending INIT-/INIT-ACKs or
> export the list of address via the sysctl interface used by netstat.
> I guess this needs to be added, right?

Yes.

— 
Bjoern A. Zeeb                             ????????? ??? ??????? ??????:
'??? ??? ???? ??????  ??????? ?? ?? ??????? ??????? ??? ????? ????? ????
?????? ?? ????? ????',  ????????? ?????????, "??? ????? ?? ?????", ?.???

_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to