Christopher Forgeron wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 8:21 PM, Markus Gebert <
> markus.geb...@hostpoint.ch > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Is 65517 correct? With Ricks patch, I get this:
>
> dev.ix.0.hw_tsomax: 65518
>
>
>
> Perhaps a difference between 9.2 and 10 for one of the macros? My
> code is:
>
> ifp->if_hw_tsomax = IP_MAXPACKET - (ETHER_HDR_LEN +
> ETHER_VLAN_ENCAP_LEN);
> printf("CSF - 3 Init, ifp->if_hw_tsomax = %d\n", ifp->if_hw_tsomax);
>
The difference is simply that IP_MAXPACKET == 65535, but I've been using
32 * MCLBYTES == 65536 (the latter is the amount of data m_defrag() can
squeeze into 32 mbuf clusters).
ie. I've suggested:
ifp->if_hw_tsomax = min(32 * MCLBYTES - (ETHER_HDR_LEN +
ETHER_VLAN_ENCAP_LEN),
IP_MAXPACKET);
- I put the min() in just so it wouldn't break if MCLBYTES is increased someday.
rick
>
> (BTW, you should submit the hw_tsomax sysctl patch, that's useful to
> others)
>
>
>
>
>
> Also the dtrace command you used excludes 65518...
>
>
>
> Oh, I thought it was giving every packet that is greater than or
> equal to 65518 - Could you show me the proper command? That's the
> third time I've used dtrace, so I'm making this up as I go. :-)
>
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
