"John W. O'Brien" <j...@saltant.com> writes: Hi John,
> I haven't done the mind meld with "reverse" yet. > Could you comment on why you need to operate in a reversed NAT > environment? In this particular case, this is a test lab. The purpose of this kind of setup is the following : - administrator of the remote lan demands your endpoint to be seen as a unique ip address on his ipsec device. - subnet ranges on each side conflict, so one must be natted. > What is it that's being reversed, and how does that apply to your use > case? Packets from local lan to remote lan are natted on the internal interface of gateway1 (source address is translated to match the ipsec policy) Regards Éric _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
