On Sep 14, 2013, at 15:24 , Luigi Rizzo <ri...@iet.unipi.it> wrote: > On Saturday, September 14, 2013, Olivier Cochard-Labbé <oliv...@cochard.me> > wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Luigi Rizzo <ri...@iet.unipi.it> wrote: >>> >>> IXIA ? For the timescales we need to address we don't need an IXIA, >>> a netmap sender is more than enough >>> >> >> The great netmap generates only one IP flow (same src/dst IP and same >> src/dst port). > > True the sample app generates only one flow but it is trivial to modify it > to generate multiple flows. My point was, we have the ability to generate > high rate traffic, as long as we do tolerate a .1-1us jitter. Beyond that, > you do need some ixia-like solution. > On the bandwidth side, can a modern sender with netmap really do a full 10G? I hate the cost of an IXIA but I have not been able to destroy our stack as effectively with anything else.
Best, George
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
