Mike Tancsa wrote: > On 9/10/2013 6:42 PM, Barney Cordoba wrote: > > NFS has been broken since Day 1, so lets not come to conclusions > > about > > anything > > as it relates to NFS. > > iSCSI is NFS ? > It would be really nice if you could try trasz`s new iSCSI stack and see how well it works. (I, for one, am hoping it makes it into 10.0, but it may be too late.)
rick > ---Mike > > > > > BC > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:* Mike Tancsa <m...@sentex.net> > > *To:* Rick Macklem <rmack...@uoguelph.ca> > > *Cc:* FreeBSD Net <n...@freebsd.org>; David Wolfskill > > <da...@catwhisker.org> > > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 4, 2013 11:26 AM > > *Subject:* TSO help or hindrance ? (was Re: TSO and FreeBSD vs > > Linux) > > > > On 9/4/2013 8:50 AM, Rick Macklem wrote: > >> David Wolfskill wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> I noticed that when I tried to write files to NFS, I could write > >>> small > >>> files OK, but larger ones seemed to ... hang. > >>> * "ifconfig -v em0" showed flags TSO4 & VLAN_HWTSO turned on. > >>> * "sysctl net.inet.tcp.tso" showed "1" -- enabled. > >>> > >>> As soon as I issued "sudo net.inet.tcp.tso=0" ... the copy worked > >>> without > >>> a hitch or a whine. And I was able to copy all 117709618 bytes, > >>> not > >>> just > >>> 2097152 (2^21). > >>> > >>> Is the above expected? It came rather as a surprise to me. > >>> > >> Not surprising to me, I'm afraid. When there are serious NFS > >> problems > >> like this, it is often caused by a network fabric issue and broken > >> TSO is at the top of the list w.r.t. cause. > > > > > > I was just experimenting a bit with iSCSI via FreeNAS and was a > > little > > disappointed at the speeds I was getting. So, I tried disabling tso > > on > > both boxes and it did seem to speed things up a bit. Data and > > testing > > methods attached in a txt file. > > > > I did 3 cases. > > > > Just boot up FreeNAS and the initiator without tweaks. That had > > the > > worst performance. > > disable tso on the nic as well as via sysctl on both boxes. That > > had the > > best performance. > > re-enable tso on both boxes. That had better performance than the > > first > > case, but still not as good as totally disabling it. I am guessing > > something is not quite being re-enabled properly ? But its > > different > > than the other two cases ?!? > > > > tgt is FreeNAS-9.1.1-RELEASE-x64 (a752d35) and initiator is r254328 > > 9.2 > > AMD64 > > > > The FreeNAS box has 16G of RAM, so the file is being served out of > > cache > > as gstat shows no activity when sending out the file > > > > > > > > ---Mike > > > > > > -- > > ------------------- > > Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 > > Sentex Communications, m...@sentex.net <mailto:m...@sentex.net> > > Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net > > Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-net@freebsd.org <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org> mailing > > list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org > > <mailto:freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org>" > > > > > -- > ------------------- > Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 > Sentex Communications, m...@sentex.net > Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net > Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/ > _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
