Hello, Luigi. You wrote 14 августа 2013 г., 14:21:09: LR> Then the problem remains that we should keep a copy of route and LR> arp information in the socket instead of redoing the lookups on LR> every single transmission, as they consume some 25% of the time of LR> a sendto(), and probably even more when it comes to large tcp LR> segments, sendfile() and the like. And we should invalidate this info on ARP/route changes, or connection will be lost in such cases, am I right?.. So, on each such event code should look into all sockets and check, if routing/ARP information is still valid for them. Or we should store lists of sockets in routing and ARP tables... I don't know, what is worse.
-- // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <l...@freebsd.org> _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
