On 8/2/2013 2:44 AM, Joe Moog wrote:
On Aug 1, 2013, at 4:27 PM, Joe Moog <joem...@ebureau.com> wrote:

On Aug 1, 2013, at 3:55 PM, Ryan Stone <ryst...@gmail.com> wrote:

Have you tried using only two ports, but both from the NIC?  My suspicion would 
be that the problem is in the lagg's handling of more than 2 ports rather than 
the driver, especially given that it is the igb driver in all cases.
Ryan:

We have done this successfully with two ports on the NIC, on another 
hardware-identical host. That said, it is entirely possible that this is a 
shortcoming of lagg.

Can you think of any sort of workaround? Our desired implementation really 
requires the inclusion of all 4 ports in the lagg. Failing this we're looking 
at the likelihood of 10G ethernet, but with that comes significant overhead, 
both cost and administration (before anybody tries to force the cost debate, 
remember that there are 10G router modules and 10G-capable distribution 
switches involved, never mind the cabling and SFPs -- it's not just a $600 10G 
card for the host). I'd like to defer that requirement as long as possible. 4 
aggregated gig ports would serve us perfectly well for the near-term.

Thanks

Joe
UPDATE: After additional testing, I'm beginning to suspect the igb driver. With our 
setup, ifconfig identifies all the ethernet ports as igb(0-5). I configured igb0 with a 
single static IP address (say, 192.168.1.10), and was able to connect to the host 
administratively. While connected, I enabled another port as a second standalone port, 
again with a unique address (say, 192.168.1.20), and was able to access the host via that 
interface as well. The problem arises when we attempt to similarly add a third interface 
to the mix -- and it doesn't seem to matter what interface(s) we use, or in what order we 
activate them. Always on the third interface, that third interface fails to respond 
despite showing "active" both in ifconfig and on the switch.

If there is anything else I could try that would be useful to help identify 
where the issue may reside, please let me know.

Thanks

Joe

_______________________________________________

Assign IP addresses from __different__ subnets to the four NIC ports and 
re-test.
(e.g., 192.168.0.10/24, 1.10/24, 2.10/24, 3.10/24).

--

Best regards.
Hooman Fazaeli

_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to