On 12/02/2013 18:57, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 12/02/2013 18:52, Freddie Cash wrote: >> Any reason you can't just use lagg(4) in one of the non-LACP modes? That's >> bascially designed to do exactly what you want. > > No particular reason, I'm just not familiar enough with it. Will e.g. > the "loadbalance" mode "just work" ? Should I expect any problems?
Actually, I know next to nothing about link aggregation. How do ARP requests get solved? Would an attached L3-aware switch see the same IP address on two ports? Since "loadbalance" chooses ports based on a hash, it will probably start dropping 50% of the outgoing traffic if one of the two links dies?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
