On 02/10/2013 18:30, Eggert, Lars wrote:
On Feb 10, 2013, at 6:05, Kevin Oberman <kob6...@gmail.com> wrote:
One idea that popped into my head (and may be completely ridiculous,
is to make its availability dependent on a kernel option and have
warning in NOTES about it contravening normal and accepted practice
and that it can cause serious problems both for yourself and for
others using the network.

Also, if it gets merged, don't call it TCP_IGNOREIDLE. Call it 
TCP_BLAST_DANGEROUSLY_AFTER_IDLE.

TCP_AVALANCHE

cheers,
gja

_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to