On 11/13/12 12:25 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 13.11.2012 09:18, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 11/13/12 12:06 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 13.11.2012 07:45, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
If you are concerned about the space/time tradeoff I'm pretty happy
with making it 1/2, 1/4th, 1/8th
the size of maxsockets. (smaller?)
Would that work better?
I'd go for 1/8 or even 1/16 with a lower bound of 512. More than
that is excessive.
I'm OK with 1/8. All I'm really going for is trying to make it
somewhat better than 512 when un-tuned.
>
PS: Please note that my patch for mbuf and maxfiles tuning is not yet
in HEAD, it's still sitting in my tcp_workqueue branch. I still have
to search for derived values that may get totally out of whack with
the new scaling scheme.
This is cool! Thank you for the feedback.
Would you like me to put this on a user branch somewhere for you to
merge into your perf branch?
I can put it into my branch and also merge it to HEAD with
a "Submitted by: alfred" line.
Thank you, that works. Note: it's not even compile tested at this point.
I should be able to do so tomorrow.
Are there other hashes to look at? I noticed a few more:
UDBHASHSIZE
netinet/tcp_hostcache.c:#define TCP_HOSTCACHE_HASHSIZE 512
netinet/sctp_constants.h:#define SCTP_TCBHASHSIZE 1024
netinet/sctp_constants.h:#define SCTP_PCBHASHSIZE 256
netinet/tcp_syncache.c:#define TCP_SYNCACHE_HASHSIZE 512
Any of these look like good targets? I think most could be looked at.
I've only glanced. I can provide deltas.
-Alfred
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
