Sami Halabi wrote:
Hi,
what form of load balancing it makes?
is that apply to 8.3-R/S also?
thanks,
Sami
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Li, Qing <qing...@bluecoat.com> wrote:
It is not working properly in one case, of load balancing among physical
interfaces having a single prefix, all are attached to the same physical
link, and reaching a single first-hop router.
The feature itself, of installing (/removing) multiple routing entries of
varying
first-hop to the same destination, and having traffic load balance among
the installed routes work fine.
--Qing
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
n...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Sean Bruno
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 10:45 AM
To: Eugene M. Zheganin
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ECMP and RADIX_MPATH
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 01:27 -0700, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
The problem is that this topic lacks the documentation like totally.
From the commit comments I understand that with RADIX_MPATH I can
use
more than one route towards the destination, but I really cannot find
anywhere the answer to the question 'will some form of balancing,
per-flow or per-packet take place'.
It appears that RADIX_MPATH is currently not working properly. See
this
months mail threads [stable-9] where we discussed it.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2012-May/032331.html
sean
If you intend to use MPATH in production have a glance at this thread
from last year for possible problems:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2011-December/030683.html
Thanks,
J
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
