Hi, I KNOW you own the driver,i just mentioned that because its not listed on intel's site,and that would be a base for decisions when someone want to pick a card that works on fbsd:) so its better get listed as well, no one is going to check *.c files.
Sami On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Jack Vogel <jfvo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Funny, since I own the driver, one would think I'd know :) > > If you go look in the source directory for ixgbe you'll find a couple files > in there: ixgbe_x540.[ch]. That should be a clue... > > Jack > > > > On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Sami Halabi <sodyn...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> x540has no fbsd driver >> >> Sami >> >> >> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Jack Vogel <jfvo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> The 82599 is and has been officially supported for some time, the manual >>> tends to lag, I will try and get it updated. In fact, given a choice I >>> would always >>> go with the 599. And yes, the X540 should be stable, its just not yet >>> being >>> used as much yet. >>> >>> Jack >>> >>> >>> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Julian Stecklina <j...@alien8.de> wrote: >>> >>> > Thus spake Marko Zec <z...@fer.hr>: >>> > >>> > > Hi all, >>> > > >>> > > Although the ixgbe driver appears to have code for both 82598 and >>> 82599 >>> > > chipsets, the manual page stil lists only 82598 based cards as >>> officially >>> > > supported. Does anybody have first-hand experiences with 82599 based >>> > cards >>> > > and recent versions of the ixgbe driver (-CURRENT, 9.0, 8.3)? >>> > >>> > We recently bought one: >>> > >>> > ix0@pci0:34:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0xa02c8086 chip=0x151c8086 >>> > rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 >>> > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' >>> > device = '82599EB 10 Gigabit TN Network Connection' >>> > class = network >>> > subclass = ethernet >>> > ix1@pci0:34:0:1: class=0x020000 card=0xa02c8086 chip=0x151c8086 >>> > rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 >>> > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' >>> > device = '82599EB 10 Gigabit TN Network Connection' >>> > class = network >>> > subclass = ethernet >>> > >>> > It's currently used on 9.0 for benchmarking another box. Never had any >>> > problems. Can someone say whether the X540 support in CURRENT is >>> stable? >>> > >>> > Regards, Julian >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >>> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >>> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Sami Halabi >> Information Systems Engineer >> NMS Projects Expert >> >> > -- Sami Halabi Information Systems Engineer NMS Projects Expert _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
