YongHyeon PYUN <pyu...@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 09:51:19AM -0400, enoch wrote: >> YongHyeon PYUN <pyu...@gmail.com> writes: >> >> > On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 12:37:15AM -0400, enoch wrote: >> >> YongHyeon PYUN <pyu...@gmail.com> writes: >> >> >> >> > On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 01:45:30AM -0400, enoch wrote: >> >> >> YongHyeon PYUN <pyu...@gmail.com> writes: >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 07:36:36PM -0400, enoch wrote: >> >> >> >> YongHyeon PYUN <pyu...@gmail.com> writes: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 03:50:02AM -0400, enoch wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On 04/02/2012 03:52 PM, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: >> >> >> >> >> > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:40:44AM -0400, enoch wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> On 03/30/2012 19:38, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 03:01:52AM -0400, enoch wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>>> Recently it became extremely difficult to pass the DHCP >> >> >> >> >> >>>> discovery step >> >> >> >> >> >>>> on boot. Now I am using the buggy [nve] instead. >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> Can anyone help? >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Did you set synchronous_dhclient option in rc.conf? >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Yes: ifconfig_nfe0="SYNCDHCP" >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I guess [nfe] is undergoing gradual devel changes of some >> >> >> >> >> >> sort as before >> >> >> >> >> >> it had some chance of reporting "empty headers" on initial >> >> >> >> >> >> ifconfig and >> >> >> >> >> >> refusing to work. Sorry, I should have reported when >> >> >> >> >> >> encountering the >> >> >> >> >> >> first problems rather than solve by reboot. >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > Would you show me the output of both dmesg(nfe(4) and its PHY >> >> >> >> >> > only) >> >> >> >> >> > and 'sysctl dev.nfe.0.stats'? >> >> >> >> >> > It would be also helpful to know whether nfe(4) still sees >> >> >> >> >> > incoming traffic. >> >> >> >> >> > Does assigning static IP work? >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Static IP direct communication attempt from this desktop to >> >> >> >> >> another >> >> >> >> >> laptop through a crossover cable fails as follows. Thanks. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> nfe0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric >> >> >> >> >> 0 mtu 1500 >> >> >> >> >> options=82008<VLAN_MTU,WOL_MAGIC,LINKSTATE> >> >> >> >> >> ether 00:1f:bc:00:19:dc >> >> >> >> >> inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast >> >> >> >> >> 192.168.0.255 >> >> >> >> >> media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT >> >> >> >> >> <full-duplex,flowcontrol,master,rxpause,txpause>) >> >> >> >> >> status: active >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> nfe0: link state changed to UP >> >> >> >> >> nfe0: <NVIDIA nForce 430 MCP13 Networking Adapter> port >> >> >> >> >> 0xf200-0xf207 >> >> >> >> >> mem 0xefffb000-0xefffbfff irq 21 at device 20.0 on pci0 >> >> >> >> >> miibus1: <MII bus> on nfe0 >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > It seems you've omitted PHY driver here. What PHY driver was >> >> >> >> > attached to nfe(4)? >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> miibus1: <MII bus> on nfe0 >> >> >> >> rgephy1: <RTL8169S/8110S/8211B media interface> PHY 1 on miibus1 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> nfe0: Ethernet address: 00:1f:bc:00:19:dc >> >> >> >> >> nfe0: [FILTER] >> >> >> >> >> nfe0: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 0 pkt len 0) >> >> >> >> >> nfe0: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 0 pkt len 0) >> >> >> >> >> nfe0: link state changed to UP >> >> >> >> >> nfe0: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 0 pkt len 0) >> >> >> >> >> nfe0: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 0 pkt len 0) >> >> >> >> >> nfe0: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 0 pkt len 0) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.frame_errors: 0 >> >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.extra_bytes: 0 >> >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.late_cols: 0 >> >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.runts: 0 >> >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.jumbos: 0 >> >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.fifo_overuns: 0 >> >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.crc_errors: 0 >> >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.fae: 0 >> >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.len_errors: 0 >> >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.unicast: 56 >> >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.multicast: 0 >> >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.broadcast: 280 >> >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.octets: 7517 >> >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.zero_rexmits: 51 >> >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.one_rexmits: 0 >> >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.multi_rexmits: 0 >> >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.late_cols: 0 >> >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.fifo_underuns: 0 >> >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.carrier_losts: 0 >> >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.excess_deferrals: 0 >> >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.retry_errors: 0 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > Thanks. Would you show me the output of "pciconf -lcbv"? >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> nfe0@pci0:0:20:0: class=0x068000 card=0x10003842 >> >> >> >> chip=0x026910de rev=0xa3 hdr=0x00 >> >> >> >> vendor = 'NVIDIA Corporation' >> >> >> >> device = 'MCP51 Network Bus Enumerator' >> >> >> >> class = bridge >> >> >> >> bar [10] = type Memory, range 32, base 0xefffb000, size 4096, >> >> >> >> enabled >> >> >> >> bar [14] = type I/O Port, range 32, base 0xf200, size 8, >> >> >> >> enabled >> >> >> >> cap 01[44] = powerspec 2 supports D0 D1 D2 D3 current D0 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Interestingly, now that nfe0 is using a static IP it sometimes boots >> >> >> >> up properly. Are you interested in its good working? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Yes I am. Would you try attached patch and let me know whether the >> >> >> > patch makes any difference on your box? >> >> >> >> >> >> Sorry to report: The patch was applied (to 8-stable latest code) but >> >> >> out >> >> >> of 3 boots only one succeeded. Same stream of "nfe0: discard frame w/o >> >> >> leading ethernet header (len 0 pkt len 0)" messages. >> >> > >> >> > Ok, back out previous patch and try attached one. >> >> >> >> With these two patch files applied to the 8-stable code, buildkernel >> >> fails as follows. >> >> >> >> /usr/src/sys/modules/nfe/../../dev/nfe/if_nfe.c: In function 'nfe_attach': >> >> /usr/src/sys/modules/nfe/../../dev/nfe/if_nfe.c:629: error: 'struct >> >> mii_softc' has no member named 'mii_mpd_oui' >> >> /usr/src/sys/modules/nfe/../../dev/nfe/if_nfe.c:629: error: 'struct >> >> mii_softc' has no member named 'mii_mpd_oui' >> >> /usr/src/sys/modules/nfe/../../dev/nfe/if_nfe.c:630: error: 'struct >> >> mii_softc' has no member named 'mii_mpd_model' >> >> *** Error code 1 >> >> >> > >> > Oops, sorry I forgot that this part of change was not merged to >> > stable/8. I've attached a minimal patch which would be cleanly >> > applied to stable/8. >> >> Wasn't the attached diff3 already included in diff2? Seems to me the >> wrong file was attached this time. Please advise. > > diff2 is subset of diff3 but it can be merged to stable/8 and > stable/7. Probably diff2 may have better chance to fully > reinitialize PHY but let's see whether diff3 also makes difference > on your box. > So back out any changes and apply diff3.
I'm sorry, this if_nfereg.h patch is not enough. Boot failure frequency is just the same. I guess I should consider migrating to 9-stable. The problem with 9-stable is that most of the time it does not build :-( Thanks for your efforts. Enoch. > >> >> > >> >> Sorry, I can't handle 9-stable. Enoch. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
