On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:12:52PM -0500, Mikhail T. wrote: > >Do not use natd, use ipfw nat instead - it uses the same libalias > >but completely in kernel and avoids gigantic natd overhead. > I guess, I'll have to research this new method... But I don't recall this > being a problem with FreeBSD-7.x -- are there some known regressions in > natd from 8.x?
I do not know since there is no reason in using natd with 8.2-STABLE where it supports nearly all natd's features including multiple NAT instances and shared translation tables. Eugene Grosbein _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
