On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacom...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Doug Barton <do...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On 3/30/2011 7:19 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 1:11 AM, Doug Barton<do...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > >> The only things I've been able to get from Jack is "We, at Intel, test > >> em(4) at 256k nmbclusters. We do not have problem. If you have > >> problem, raise nmbcluster.". 256k nmbcluster in my environment is not > >> acceptable. > >> > >>> Meanwhile, there are times where memory IS a constraint, and there are > >>> some > >>> things you can't do without more of it. > >>> > >> yes, but the driver should not need a manual reset between the time > >> resource are (heavily) scarce and the time it became available again. > > > > If you're facing that situation then obviously your system is constrained > by > > hardware. > No. We are taking about exceptional recoverable situation not handled > by the software, it should not bring the complete system down. If > you're swapping code has defect, you do not tell one to buy more RAM > not to trigger the defective code, you fix the code. The situation is > similar here. > > The code that got put in the driver has a response to this "unrecoverable situation", you've flamed me and the code, but you've not demonstrated it does not work. Both Beezar and myself have tried to have a civil discussion over the matter and you just have gotten rude. As demonstrated in this email thread. I don't know about you, but I have feelings, and you've been insensitive to them. So quote chapters and verses all you like, I'm DONE with this. Jack _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
