On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 11:50:28PM +0100, Pawel Tyll wrote: ... > This machine is only doing dummynet traffic shaping from significant > things (otherwise it runs a dhcpd, ntpd and named). It's pretty > straight-forward routing, packets come in, packets come out via static > routes - there are currently no routing daemons involved. As to the > interfaces, there are two physical ifaces, em0 and em1, only em1 is > currently used. There are 49 vlan interfaces connected to em1, and > they are pretty much static, no IP address changes, no interfaces > going up or down, sometimes new one is being added, but there is no > automation here, and panics do not coincide with anything significant > in logs, or being done manually. Traffic oscillates between 20k pps at > night and close to 35-40k pps daytime, slightly more on weekends. > There are currently 2556 pipes defined and traffic shaping is done > with two rules: > > 30000 pipe tablearg ip from table(100) to any in > 30001 pipe tablearg ip from any to table(101) out > ... > If I missed anything here, then just tell me what more I can do, my > intentions were never to make this harder to debug or hide anything > relevant.
understood. I am just saying that for instance the vlan presence and changes is quite significant in this context. You say vlans are "pretty much static" but can you tell us who adds/remove them, assign addresses ? Also the ruleset must have something more than those two rules. >From the stack trace, the panic seems to occur in a call to the "antispoof" option which presumably is somewhere in your ruleset. If not, then the stack is corrupt. cheers luigi _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
