On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:58:04AM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > Hi, > > >>>>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:38:13 +0000 (UTC) > >>>>> "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net> said: > > > Yes, it is the internal scope address representation of the KAME IPv6 > > stack. It is hided in the output of 'netstat -rn'. But, it seems not > > for `netstat -ani'. There is no reason to not hide it for `netstat > > -ani', IMHO. So, I've just committed to hide it: > > > > http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?view=revision&revision=217642 > > bzeeb> Thanks; there's also a PR somewhere about it from today or yesterday. > > Oops, I didn't notice the PR. Thank you for letting me it. I've just > closed it. > > bzeeb> The real problem of course is that those things are still queried by > bzeeb> kvm(3) rather than by a real interface in which case I think the > bzeeb> kernel shouldn't export the addresses with the scope embedded. We > bzeeb> should make sure that with libnetstat or whatever, this will not come > bzeeb> back. > > Yes, I think so, too. The addresses with the scope embedded is > annoyance.
Petr Lampa - who opened the PR - explained me provately about the embedded scope. However I still think this collides with RFC3306 addresses. The other point discussed with Petr Lampa is about the ff02::2:xxxx:xxxx addresses. However the addresses are different than defined in RFC4620, where they have the format ff02::2:ffxx:xxxx. -- B.Walter <be...@bwct.de> http://www.bwct.de Modbus/TCP Ethernet I/O Baugruppen, ARM basierte FreeBSD Rechner uvm. _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
