On 22.12.2010 18:55, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > It seems, we really need sysctl disabling lagg's use of flows, don't we?
If no developer is willing to work on it right now, you should probably create a PR with your patch so it doesn't get lost. Also, a patch describing the sysctl in the lagg(4) man page would probably get it committed faster :) _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
