On Wed, 15 Dec 2010, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
I would request two things:
1) the extra couple of months; this will not prevent the evitable removal
yet only defer it.
Sounds good to me -- my goal is not to remove NETNATM, rather, the remove code
that doesn't compile or work. I'm happy to sit on this for a while and see if
things improve; fixing the former is great, fixing the latter would be even
better :-).
(I wonder if Harti is in a situation to test any of this still?)
Robert
2) If anyone of you is using (or want to be able to (continue to) use) NATM
or can test things, I re-enabled it with most of the code in HEAD and
the patch is available for 8,x as well but need to work with somoene
to make sure it'll really work. I am willing to spend more time on it
if you send me an email.
Best Regards,
Bjoern
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Author: bz
Date: Wed Dec 15 22:58:45 2010
New Revision: 216466
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/216466
Log:
Bring back (most of) NATM to avoid further bitrot after r186119.
Keep three lines disabled which I am unsure if they had been used at all.
This will allow us to seek testers and possibly bring it all back.
If you have the ability to test (on 8.x or HEAD) or are using NATM,
please get in contact with me.
Discussed with: rwatson
MFC after: 7 weeks
Modified:
head/sys/conf/NOTES
head/sys/netinet/if_atm.c
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb Welcome a new stage of life.
<ks> Going to jail sucks -- <bz> All my daemons like it!
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"