Hi, The indirect route is colliding with the interface route, both have the same mask.
How do you expect this to work ? How would the routing code differentiate between on-link nodes and the those needing to be routed through 10.11.11.1 ? -- Qing > > one of the problems: > sysctl -w net.inet.flowtable.enable=0 > route add 10.13.13.0/24 10.11.11.1 -weight 2 > ifconfig em1 alias 10.13.13.90/24 > > arp-resolve fails: > arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 10.13.13.95 > > in sys/netinet/in.c: > in_lltable_lookup calls in_lltable_rtcheck which calls rtalloc1 > rtalloc1 seems to return the first route - and does not check for more. > > diag from in_lltable_rtcheck: > IPv4 address: "10.13.13.95" is not on the network > > checking now how to repair this. > > Kind regards, > Ingo Flaschberger _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
