On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 11:19:13AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 08/07/2010 11:11 Andre Oppermann said the following: > > > > Can you check whether your patch fixes the bug when you go over a real > > network? > > As I understand the patch is not supposed to fix the bug, it's supposed to > catch > it early. I.e. get panic instead of data corruption.
Right, the patch maps the page in sf buffer read-only (on i386 only). But note the parallel posting with m_cat() change. It is still not enough, and I am not set up for the real network testing ATM.
pgp9xPc6lOcA7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
