On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 05:46:02PM -0400, Randall Stewart wrote: > Hi all: > > I have had some fun in my day job playing with exchanging 64bit > numbers. Unfortunately > there is no ntohll() OR htonll() which would be the logical thing (for > us old farts) to use. > > Yes, I have found htobe64() and friends.. and that would work.. but I > still cannot > help but feeling we should have the ntohll() and htonll().. for > consistency if nothing > else. > > Any objections to this showing up in a head near you soon (speak soon > or I will commit > the patches to add these ;-D)
strong objection! We should instead use names with exact sizes (16,32,64). In case you want to use Roman Numbers, 64 would be LXIV :) cheers luigi _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
