-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, David,
On 2010/03/08 12:03, David Horn wrote: > On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Andrew Thompson <thom...@freebsd.org> wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 11:12:25AM -0800, Xin LI wrote: >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Maybe this is a stupid question but I really don't understand why a >>> interface with IFF_DRV_OACTIVE can't be added to a lagg(4) interface. >>> Looking at OpenBSD code, they do this since the day 0. >>> >>> Could anyone shed some light, why we need to enforce this check? :) >> >> I think it was just carried over, I dont see any reason to keep it. > > That's good news. > > Someone, please review and commit attached patch for > sys/net/if_lagg.c. This also fixes my PR: kern/139117. This is exactly the patch I'm talking about so I committed against - -HEAD. Will MFC after 1 month so we can see if there would be some concerns or objections from others. For kern/139117, this change MAY have made the problem to disappear but I'm not convinced that the real bug has been fixed, though... Cheers, - -- Xin LI <delp...@delphij.net> http://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or die -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLlZxyAAoJEATO+BI/yjfB86wH/ixeSSUoIXRmja8Ujzwg9Xdw 0qeaGQZIVtYfpnVHUZ/oQ52fo9OoingogKruT8iN8oVECht90Jac5+O6xQoS1CPr G/smeZJqG/n17WTshe7Oid/D8LfiABsA+drfY57gDx4YPrKX3NRApRwRFjLcRO97 S0K7XJpItDyQ8YZVxwVJa0B3R3kC6tGxCaQ8YL4VWYa/sHrgxbmeo7RWgLUJ51oP H4NVNllk3grjln2Kv0DJHhvAkVfQocHFCJvQJ8sNGSdLjfVqr//RBHY0QhfviyfQ McfiGkA9QAG8A09wWjUTF+8dEs5jzCk0CdUhbEEhRFByuBskwAeyX+Ak0BYflLw= =oTzy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
