> > We have asked Cisco repeatedly, through official channels, whether > > they *support* /31 on Ethernet links. The answer is always that it > > *may* work, use at your own peril. > > i have managed O(10^3) ciscos in isp backbone(s). /31s predominate for > ether links in that space. though i suspect there is more multipoint in > the enterprise space. > > we need to be able to use /31s and /127s on freebsd if it is to be used > in the routing space.
I agree about that. However, I was simply reacting to the claim that it was *supported* by Cisco. We have asked both Cisco and Juniper, and neither company is willing to state that it is *supported*. Our Ethernet core links are /30 for IPv4 and /124 for IPv6. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
