> From my perspective, putting it in a separate db outside the kernel > kind of defeats the purpose. I thought the first patches had the > right idea. though for me the current ability to rename an interface > is good enough. I mean is you can cal your interface "Sydney0" or > "Melbourne2" that is really enough..
Having read the discussion, I agree that the description should be in the kernel. However, being a router geek the ability to rename an interface to "Sydney0" or "Melbourne2" is not at all enough. For the routers & switches I work with we really want a description of at least 50 characters - and it's important to be able to include space. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
