> >> you could set up 2 routing tables and assign different apps to use > >> different tables > > > > Is it possible to select routing table by ipfw setfib X ? > > > > someting like: > > > > ipfw add setfib 1 ip from a.b.c.d to any out xmit em0 > > setfib 1 route add default 10.10.10.1 > > no that wouldn't work for 2 reasons. > 1/ for local sockets, the routing decision is made already before it > gets to the firewall > 2/ for non-ocal packets (from another machine that you are routing) > the packet needs to be tested on the recv (in) side of things > but by then the sending machine has aready decided on a local address too.
Not nice. I have a dream, that fbsd now capable to do real multi-fib routing :( What about ipfw fwd ? That was working years ago for me, but of course, requires to put all custom routing entries into ipfw rules. What about binding of FIBs to local addresses or/and interfaces ? Such way that kernel will decide what fib to use examining local IP address of package ? -- Vladimir B. Grebenschikov v...@fbsd.ru _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
