On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 04:24:44PM -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote: > On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:11 AM, VANHULLEBUS Yvan <va...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 02:41:41PM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > [snip] > >> We have about 3 months left to get that patch in for 8; ideally 6 > >> weeks. Can you update the nat-t patch in a way as discussed here > >> before so that the extra address is in etc. and we can move forward? > > > > Done, new version is available here: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~vanhu/NAT-T/experimental/patch-FreeBSD-TRUNK-NATT-pfkey-clean-2009-02-26.diff > > Hello,
Hi. > We recently tested this patch on a up to date current as of a couple > hours ago and it seems to break all outgoing UDP traffic (DNS > included). There's a conflict between INP_ESPINUDP* and other INP_* commited since 2009-02-26. > Has anyone else experienced this issue? Backing the patch out of our > pfSense patch roster cleared up the problem. > > Is there a newer patch available by chance? Actually, not, because there are no bits left in inp_flags, so we are actually looking for another location to put them. Yvan. _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
