Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
Peter Steele wrote:
...
I personally like this idea, but I'm not sure I can sell it to the
others. Are there any restrictions to these 169.254.x.y addresses?
169.254.0.0/16 must never appear outside a link -- it is strictly
scoped to that link.
P.S. I checked in a change to ip_forward() a while back which enforces
this, as forwarding such traffic between interfaces without NATting it
or otherwise proxying it is a really bad idea (and also breaks the IPv4
LL RFC).
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
